www.nytimes.com /1972/07/03/archives/rainmaking-is-used-as-weapon-by-us-cloudseeding-in-indochina-is.html

Rainmaking Is Used As Weapon by U.S.

The New York Times 12-15 minutes 7/3/1972

Rainmaking Is Used As Weapon by U.S.

Credit...The New York Times Archives

See the article in its original context from
July 3, 1972

,

Page

1Buy Reprints

New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.

*Does not include Crossword-only or Cooking-only subscribers.

About the Archive

This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.

Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

WASHINGTON, July 2—The United States has been secretly seeding clouds over North Vi etnam, Laos and South Viet nam to increase and control the rainfall for military purposes.

Government sources, both ci vilian and military, said during an extensive series of inter views that the Air Force cloud seeding program has been aimed most recently at hinder ing movement of North Viet namese troops and equipment and suppressing enemy antiair craft missile fire.

The disclosure confirmed growing speculation in Con gressional and scientific circles about the use of weather mod ification in Southeast Asia. De spite years of experiments with rainmaking in the United States and elsewhere, scientists are not sure they understand its long‐term effect on the ecology of a region.

Some Opposed Program

The weather manipulation in Indochina, which was first tried in South Vietnam in 1963, is the first confirmed use of meteorological warfare. Al though it is not prohibited by any international conventions on warfare, artificial rainmak ing has been strenuously opposed by some State Depart ment officials.

It could not be determined whether the operations were being conducted in connection with the current North Viet namese offensive or the renewed American bombing of the North.

Effectiveness Doubted

Beginning in 1967, some State Department officials pro tested that the United States, by deliberately altering the nat ural rainfall in parts of Indo china, was taking environmen tal risks of unknown propor tions. But many advocates of the operation have found little wrong with using weather mod ification as a military weapon.

“What's worse,” one official asked, “dropping bombs or rain?”

All of the officials inter viewed said that the United States did not have the capabil ity to cause heavy floods dur ing the summer in the northern parts of North Vietnam, where serious floods occurred last year.

Officially, the White House and State Department declined comment on the use of meteorological warfare. “This is one of those things where no one is going to say anything,” one official said.

Most officials interviewed agreed that the seeding had accomplished one of its main objectives —muddying roads and flooding lines of communi cation. But there were also many military and Government officials who expressed doubt that the project had caused any dramatic results.

The sources, without provid ing details, also said that a method had been “developed for treating clouds with a chemical that eventually produced an acidic rainfall capable of foul ing the operation of North Viet namese radar equipment used for directing surface‐to‐air mis siles.

In additidn to hampering SAM missiles and delaying North Vietnamese infiltration, the rainmaking program had the following purposes:

¶ Providing rain and cloud cover for infiltration of South Vietnamese commando and in telligence teams into North Vietnam.

¶ Serving as a “spoiler” for North Vietnamese attacks and raids in South Vietnam.

¶ Altering or tailoring the rain patterns over North Viet nam and Laos to aid United States bombing missions.

¶ Diverting North Vietnamese men and material from military operations to keep muddied roads and lines of communica tion in operation.

Keyed to Monsoon

The cloud‐seeding operations necessarily were keyed to the two main monsoon seasons that affect Laos and Vietnam. “It was just trying to add on to something that you already got,” one officer said.

Military sources said that one Main goal was to increase the duration of the southwest mon soon which spawns high‐rising cumulus clouds — those most susceptible to cloud‐seeding— over the panhandle areas of Laos and North Vietnam from May to early October. The long er rainy season thus would give the Air Force more opportun ity to trigger rainstorms.

“We were trying to arrange the weather pattern to suit our convenience,” said one former Government official who had detailed knowledge of the oper ation.

According to interviews, the Gentrel Intelligence Agency in itiated the use of cloud‐seeding over Hue, in the northern part of South Vietnam. “We first used that stuff in about August of 1963,” one former C.I.A. agent said, “when the Diem regime was having all that trouble with the Buddhists.”

“They would just stand around during demonstrations when the police threw tear gas at them, but we noticed that when the rains came they wouldn't stay on,” the former agent said.

“The agency got an Air America Beechcraft and had it rigged up with silver iodide,” he said. “There was another demonstration and we seeded the area. It rained.”

A similar cloud‐seeding was carried out by C.I.A. aircraft in Saigon at least once during the summer of 1964 the former agent said

Expanded to Trail

The intelligence agency ex panded its cloud‐seeding activi ties to the Ho Chi Minh supply trail in Laos sometime in the middle nineteen‐sixties, a num ber of Government sources said. By 1967, the Air Force had become involved although, as one former Government of ficial said, “the agency was calling all the shots.”

“I always assumed the agen cy had a mandate from the White House to do it,” he added.

A number of former CIA and high‐ranking Johnson Adminis tration officials depicted the operations along the trail as experimental.

The art had not yet advanced to the point where it was possible to predict the results of a seeding operation with any degree of confidence, one Government official said. “We used to go out flying around and looking for a cer tain cloud formation,” the offi cial said “And we made a lot of mistakes. Once we dumped seven inches of rain in two hours on one of our Special Forces camps.”

Despite the professed skepti cism on the Part of some mem bers of the Joluison Administra tiory Military Men: apparently took the Weather modification program much more seriously.

According to a document contained in the Pentagon papers, Defense Depart ment's secret history of the war, weather modification was one or seven basic options for step ping up the war that were pre sented on request by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the White House in late February, 1967. The document described the weather program over Laos— officially known as Operation Pop‐Eye—as an attempt “to reduce traficability along infil tration routes.”

It said that Presidential authorization was “required to implement operational phase of weather modification process previously successfully tested and evaluated in same area.” The brief summary concluded by stating, that “risk of com promise is minimal.”

A similar option was cited in another 1967 Working docu ment published in the Pentagon papers. Neither attracted any immediate public attention.

The Laos cloud seeding op erations did provoke, however, a lengthy and bitter, albeit secret, dispute inside the John son Administration in 1967. A team of State Department at torneys and officials protested that the use of cloud‐seeding was a dangerous precedent for the United States.

“I felt that the military and agency hadn't analyzed it to determine if it was in our interest,” one official who was involved in the dispute said. He also was concerned over the rigid secrecy of the project, he said, “although it might have been all right to keep it secret if you did it once and didn't want the precedent to become known.”

The general feeling was sum marized by one former State Department official who said he was concerned that the rainmaking “might violate what we considered the general rule of thumb for an illegal weapon of war—something that would cause unusual suf fering or disproportionate dam age.” There was also‐concern he added, because of the unknown ecological risks.

A Nixon Administration of ficial said that he believed the first use of weather modifi cation over. North Vietnam took place in late 1968 or early 1969 when rain was increased in an attempt to hamper the ability of antiaircraft missiles to hit. American Jets win the panhandle region near the Laotian border.

Over the next two years, this official added, “it seemed to got more important—the re ports were coming more fre quently.”

It could not be learned how many specific missions were carried out in any year.

One well‐informed source said that Navy scientists were re sponsible for developing a new kind of chemical agent effec tive in the warm stratus clouds that often shielded many key antiaircraft sites in northern parts of North Vietnam.

The chemical, he said, “pro duced a rain that had an acidid quality to it and it would foul up mechanical equipment—like radars, trucks and tahlta.”

“This wasn't originally our planning,” the official added, “it was a refinement.”

Apparently, many Air Force cloud‐seeding missions were conducted over Mirth Vietnam and Laos simply to confuse or “attenuate”—a ward used by many military rnen—the radar equipment that centrols anti aircraft missiles. The planes used far such operations, C 130's, Must fly at relatively slow speeds and at altitudes no greater than 22,000 feet to dis perse the rainmaking chemicals effectively.

A number of officials con firmed that cloud‐seeding had been widely used in South Viet nam, particularly in the north along the Laos border. “We tried to use it in connection With air and ground opera tions,” a military officer ex plained.

One Government official ex plained more explicitly that “if you were expecting a raid from their side, you would try to control the weather to make it more difficult:” This official estimated that rnore than half of the actual cloud‐seeding operations in 1969 and 1970 took place in South Vietnam.

Much of the basic research was provided by Navy scien tists; and the seeding operationa were flown by the Air Weather Service of the Air Force:

By 1967, or possibly earlier, the Air Force flights were orig inating from a special opera tions group at Udorn air base in Thailand No more than four C‐130's, and usually only two, were assigned in the highly restricted section of the base. Each plane was capable of car rying out more than one mis sion on one flight.

One former high‐ranking of ficial said in an interview that by the end of 1971 the pro gram, which had been given at least three different code names since the middle nineteen‐six ties, was under the direct con trol of the White House.

Interviews determined that many usually well‐informed members of the Nixon Admin istration had been kept in the dark.

In the last year there have been repeated inquiries and publicly posed questions by members of Congress about the weather‐ modification programs in Southeast Asia, but no ac curate information has been provided to them by the De partment of Defense. “This kind of thing was a bomb, and Henry restricted in formation about it to those who had to know,” said one well placed Government official, re ferring to Henry A. Kassinger, the President's adviser on na tional security.

Nontheless the official said, “I understood it to be a spoil ing action—that this was de scriptive of what was going on north of the DMZ with the roads and the SAM sites.”

Another source, said that most of the weather modifica tion activities eventually were conducted with the aid and sup port of the South Vietnamese. “I think we were trying to teach the South Vietnamese how to fly the cloud‐seeding mis sions,” the source said.

It was impossible to learn where the staffing and research for the secret weather opera tion were carried out. Sources at the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories at Hans comb Field in Bedford, Mass., and at the Air Weather Service headquarters, while acknowl edging that they had heard of the secret operation, said they had no information about its research center.

One Government source did say that a group was “now evaluating the program to see how much additional rain was caused.” He would not elabo rate.

Gain unlimited access to all of The Times.

Now $6.25 $1 a week for your first year.

Unlimited access to all of The Times.

Now $6.25 $1 a week for your first year.